United States v. Vas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a habeas petition is considered “second or successive” if it challenges “the same judgment” as a prior petition
• “A district court lacks jurisdiction to consider a second or successive petition if the Court of Appeals has not first authorized a petitioner to file it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Strickland v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
• Slack v. McDaniel
  Supreme Court· 2000-04-26· cited 41,291×
• Faretta v. California
  Supreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
• Smith v. Robbins
  Supreme Court· 2000-01-19· cited 3,510×
• Magwood v. Patterson
  Supreme Court· 2010-06-24· cited 932×
• Eric Robinson v. Philip L. Johnson the District Attorney of the County of Philadelphia the Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania, Mike Fisher
  Third Circuit· 2002-11-18· cited 718×
• United States v. Cyrus R. Sanders
  Third Circuit· 1999-01-21· cited 192×
• United States v. Shedrick
  Third Circuit· 2007-07-19· cited 184×
• United States v. Ronnie Peppers
  Third Circuit· 2002-08-21· cited 150×
• United States v. Winkelman
  Third Circuit· 2014-03-26· cited 121×
• United States v. George P. Salemo
  Third Circuit· 1995-07-26· cited 86×
• United States v. Lonnie Dawson
  Third Circuit· 1988-09-21· cited 64×
• Government of the Virgin Islands v. William Weatherwax
  Third Circuit· 1994-03-31· cited 54×
• Government of the Virgin Islands v. Bradshaw, Henry C. Appeal of Henry C. Bradshaw
  Third Circuit· 1984-02-28· cited 49×
• United States v. Christopher D. Jones
  Third Circuit· 2006-06-28· cited 41×
• United States v. Deluca, Dominic Angelo. Appeal of Dominic Deluca
  Third Circuit· 1990-01-11· cited 21×