Skip to main content
· 8/31/2011

United States v. Van Elsen

Citations

  • 652 F.3d 955
  • 51 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2448
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 18175
  • 2011 WL 3820839

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting property is “stolen” when thieves “deprive [the owner] of his property for so long as it suited their purposes”
  • discussing Supreme Court and this court’s precedents to discern the existence of an express element of intent and the scope of conduct implicated by the word “stolen”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, Gruender, Benton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.