· 8/31/2011
United States v. Van Elsen
Citations
- 652 F.3d 955
- 51 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2448
- 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 18175
- 2011 WL 3820839
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting property is “stolen” when thieves “deprive [the owner] of his property for so long as it suited their purposes”
- discussing Supreme Court and this court’s precedents to discern the existence of an express element of intent and the scope of conduct implicated by the word “stolen”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith, Gruender, Benton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.