United States v. Urso

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that government’s memorandum briefly summarizing anticipated testimony and evidence constituted “limited proffer,” not “full proffer”
• framing the question as whether “judicial estoppel may be applied to prevent a due process violation” (emphasis added)
• analyzing whether to dismiss predicate acts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).