Skip to main content
Seventh Circuit· 8/17/2020

United States v. UCB, Inc.

Citations

  • 970 F.3d 835

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the Government is “not required to make a particularized dollar-figure estimate of the potential costs and benefits of [a relator’s] lawsuit” in deciding whether to dismiss
  • stating that the portion of the FCA governing dismissals over the plaintiff-relator’s objections should not “be construed to eliminate the right to dismiss under the first half of Rule 41(a
  • explaining a notice to dismiss under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) is “self-executing and case terminating.”
  • “Their ancient pedigree, however, together with their widespread use at the time of the Founding, suggests that the [FCA] as a whole is not in imminent danger of unconstitutionally usurping the executive power.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scudder concurs

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. UCB, Inc.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.