United States v. Travis Eugene Keesee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a “theory for suppression not 15 advanced in district court cannot be raised for the first time on appeal”
• holding that a “theory for suppression not advanced in district court cannot be raised for the first time on appeal”
• explaining that had the defendant made his suppression argument to the district court, the issue could have been addressed
• explaining 17 that had the defendant made his suppression argument to the district court, the issue could have been addressed
• “A theory for suppression not advanced in district court cannot be raised for the first time on appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).