United States v. Daniel Clark Summers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant’s act of approaching the police officer supported the conclusion that the interaction was voluntary
• holding that no investigatory stop occurred when police partially blocked the suspect’s car and asked several times for, identification because the suspect could have left on foot
• stating that this court reviews a district court’s factual findings for clear error
• rejecting facial challenge to ACCA based on Apprendi

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).