Skip to main content
Sixth Circuit· 11/23/2022

United States v. Timmy Fields

Citations

  • 53 F.4th 1027

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • comparing the breadth of “relate to or connect with” with the narrower “necessarily entails” (citation omitted)
  • finding this argument “persuasive” but declining to “definitively decide this constitutional issue” because the district court in that case submitted the duration and recency questions to the jury
  • rejecting argument that Kentucky’s definition of “traffic” is overly broad because it includes “dispensing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

96 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. Timmy Fields

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.