Skip to main content
· 4/30/2024

United States v. Austin Lee

Citations

  • 100 F.4th 484

Oral argument

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that employee must show that the employer knew of his protected activity to constitute retaliation
  • holding that an employer must have known about an employee’s protected activity in order to have engaged in unlawful retaliation
  • holding that an employer must have known about an employee’s protected activity in order to have engaged ‘in unlawful retaliation
  • holding that an employer must have known about an employee’s protected activity in order to have engaged in unlawful retaliation
  • holding that a plaintiff failed to establish causation where the evidence did not demonstrate that the decisionmaker was aware of the allegedly protected activity at the time it acted
  • holding that a plaintiff had not established a prima facie case of retaliation where he had not shown that the allegedly retaliatory actors were aware of his protected activity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.