· 4/30/2024
United States v. Austin Lee
Citations
- 100 F.4th 484
Oral argument
- ListenArgued34 min recording
Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that employee must show that the employer knew of his protected activity to constitute retaliation
- holding that an employer must have known about an employee’s protected activity in order to have engaged in unlawful retaliation
- holding that an employer must have known about an employee’s protected activity in order to have engaged ‘in unlawful retaliation
- holding that an employer must have known about an employee’s protected activity in order to have engaged in unlawful retaliation
- holding that a plaintiff failed to establish causation where the evidence did not demonstrate that the decisionmaker was aware of the allegedly protected activity at the time it acted
- holding that a plaintiff had not established a prima facie case of retaliation where he had not shown that the allegedly retaliatory actors were aware of his protected activity
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.