United States v. Thomas Tyson Conner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that defendant who was not truthful regarding his involvement in a drug conspiracy has breached his plea agreement and was therefore not entitled to a 5K1.1 motion
• finding that defendant who was not truthful regarding his involvement in a drug conspiracy has breached his plea agreement and was therefore not entitled to a 5K1.1 motion
• reviewing district court’s resolution of whether govermnent breached plea agreement under clearly erroneous standard
• noting party alleging breach has burden of proving breach by a preponderance of the evidence
• reviewing district court's resolution of whether government breached plea agreement under clearly erroneous standard
• upholding governments's refusal to file a substantial assistance motion, despite an unconditional promise to do so because there was no evidence that the district court had clearly erred in determining that the defendant had not testified truthfully as required by the agreement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).