United States v. Wilson Fernely Urrego-Linares

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that arrest of defendant and a single coconspirator “did not necessarily mean that the conspiracy was terminated”
• holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in finding that the conspiracy had not terminated for pur- poses of Rule 801(d)(2)(E) despite the fact that the defendant had been arrested and had agreed to place a monitored telephone call to his co-conspirator
• the arrest of defendant and a single co-conspirator “did not necessarily mean that the conspiracy was terminated”
• applying preponderance of the evidence standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).