· 10/4/1972
United States v. Thomas E. Maze
Citations
- 468 F.2d 529
- 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 7309
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concurrent sentence doctrine not applied because of the 'interest of appellant in the opportunity to clear his record of a conviction of a federal felony'
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edwards, McCREE, Miller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.