United States v. Thomas Ashburn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that government’s required proof of the § 2D1.1(b)(1) enhancement “is ‘a very low bar,’ as we have repeatedly explained, and ‘[e]vidence that the weapon was found in the same location as drugs or drug paraphernalia usually suffices’”
• “[W]e have no doubt the district court would have reached the same decision with a proper application of the burden of proof.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).