United States v. Thomas Ashburn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that government’s required proof of the § 2D1.1(b)(1) enhancement “is ‘a very low bar,’ as we have repeatedly explained, and ‘[e]vidence that the weapon was found in the same location as drugs or drug paraphernalia usually suffices’”
• “[W]e have no doubt the district court would have reached the same decision with a proper application of the burden of proof.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Edward Blackorby v. BNSF Railway Company
  Eighth Circuit· 2019-08-23· cited 5×
• United States v. Javier Corona-Verduzco
  Eighth Circuit· 2020-06-24· cited 2×
• United States v. Ulysses Bush
  Eighth Circuit· 2025-10-07

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Olano
  Supreme Court· 1993-04-26· cited 16,571×
• United States v. Louis F. Pirani
  Eighth Circuit· 2005-04-29· cited 941×
• United States v. Lucht
  Eighth Circuit· 1994-02-28· cited 169×
• United States v. Gary O. Fladten
  Eighth Circuit· 2000-10-24· cited 108×
• UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, — v. CHRISTINA M. HAIDLEY, —
  Eighth Circuit· 2005-03-16· cited 101×
• United States v. Anderson
  Eighth Circuit· 2010-08-26· cited 90×
• United States v. Peroceski
  Eighth Circuit· 2008-03-28· cited 46×