United States v. Peroceski

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that for this “particular enhancement . . . the guidelines reduce the quantum of proof necessary to make out a case for its application”
• affirming the enhancement when a gun was “found in the same location as drugs or drug paraphernalia.”
• the government must “show that it is not clearly improbable that the weapon was connected to the drug offense”
• for § 2D1.1(b)(1) to apply, government must simply show that it is not clearly improbable that weapon was connected to drug offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).