United States v. Terrence Vaughan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that when a driver and passenger provide conflicting answers about their travels, this factor especially contributes to reasonable suspicion of criminal activity
• noting that when a driver and passenger provide conflicting answers about their travels, this factor especially contributes to reasonable suspicion of criminal activity
• confirming the permissibility of a dog sniff that occurred 16 minutes after the initial traffic stop and 7 to 10 minutes after reasonable suspicion first developed
• Conflicting responses about one’s travels “remains a valid factor contributing to reasonable suspicion.”
• finding nervousness relevant where it “increased” later in the stop

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).