Ninth Circuit· 7/31/2008
United States v. Stringer
Citations
- 535 F.3d 929
- 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 16240
- 2008 WL 2925032
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that 3 23-2352 defendant could not be affirmatively misled that investigation was exclusively civil when he received notice warning him of potential criminal ramifications
- collecting cases recognizing that dual investigations can implicate due process limitations
- “[A] search is unreasonable, even if consensual, if the consent is obtained by trickery or deceit.”
- discussing trickery or misleading interference with defense counsel
- discussing trickery or misleading interference with defense counsel
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schroeder, Silverman, Bybee
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. SetserFifth Circuit· 2009-05-12· cited 65×
- State v. AllenMontana Supreme Court· 2010-10-06· cited 40×
- United States v. Shannon WilliamsEighth Circuit· 2013-07-11· cited 31×
- United States v. William A. GoldsteinEleventh Circuit· 2021-02-26· cited 26×
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EllisOregon Supreme Court· 2015-02-20· cited 11×
- State v. MelendezNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2018-04-23· cited 11×
- Richard Gaetano v. United StatesSixth Circuit· 2019-11-06· cited 6×
- United States v. RenziD. Arizona· 2010-06-04· cited 5×
- Matter of People of the State of New York v. Trump Org., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2022-05-26· cited 1×
- In re Ellis / RosenbaumOregon Supreme Court· 2015-02-20
- U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. KarroumDistrict of Columbia· 2015-12-09
- State of Iowa v. Matthew Robert SewellSupreme Court of Iowa· 2021-06-04
- United States v. HeineD. Oregon· 2016-04-28
Cites
30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1951-05-28· cited 1,874×
- Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court· 1984-02-22· cited 1,569×
- United States v. KordelSupreme Court· 1970-02-24· cited 698×
- United States v. John VoigtThird Circuit· 1996-07-09· cited 454×
- United States v. George WuagneuxEleventh Circuit· 1982-08-23· cited 251×
- United States v. Horton R. PruddenFifth Circuit· 1970-06-26· cited 128×
- United States v. John E. IrwinNinth Circuit· 1980-03-26· cited 119×
- United States v. Joseph L. SclafaniSecond Circuit· 1959-06-22· cited 88×
- United States v. UnruhNinth Circuit· 1987-09-03· cited 84×
- United States v. Gerald L. RogersNinth Circuit· 1985-01-15· cited 75×
- United States v. David LehmanSeventh Circuit· 1972-10-24· cited 70×
- United States v. Florence L. PetersSeventh Circuit· 1998-08-17· cited 64×
- United States v. HaynesNinth Circuit· 2000-06-16· cited 55×
- United States v. Walter C. RobsonNinth Circuit· 1973-04-13· cited 53×
- United States v. KaatzTenth Circuit· 1983-01-20· cited 51×
- United States v. MarshankN.D. California· 1991-11-05· cited 47×
- United States v. Dale M. GrunewaldEighth Circuit· 1993-04-15· cited 45×
- Martin G. Groder v. United StatesFourth Circuit· 1987-04-09· cited 42×
- United States v. Paul J. ChurchillFirst Circuit· 1973-08-15· cited 24×
- United States v. John J. MarraSixth Circuit· 1973-07-24· cited 23×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.