Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 7/31/2008

United States v. Stringer

Citations

  • 535 F.3d 929
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 16240
  • 2008 WL 2925032

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that 3 23-2352 defendant could not be affirmatively misled that investigation was exclusively civil when he received notice warning him of potential criminal ramifications
  • collecting cases recognizing that dual investigations can implicate due process limitations
  • “[A] search is unreasonable, even if consensual, if the consent is obtained by trickery or deceit.”
  • discussing trickery or misleading interference with defense counsel
  • discussing trickery or misleading interference with defense counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schroeder, Silverman, Bybee

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.