United States Court of Military Appeals· 8/13/1979
United States v. Strangstalien
Citations
- 7 M.J. 225
- 1979 CMA LEXIS 9727
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- formation of criminal intent on base, being equivalent to the formation of a contractual agreement on base, even with terms yet to be completed off base
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cook, Fletcher, Perry
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. TrottierUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1980-10-14· cited 138×
- United States v. MurphyUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1987-02-17· cited 72×
- United States v. HardinUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1979-10-15· cited 31×
- United States v. VietorUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1980-12-08· cited 31×
- United States v. CourtsUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1980-09-29· cited 26×
- United States v. JordanUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1989-09-28· cited 25×
- United States v. CorderoUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1981-06-22· cited 17×
- United States v. WhiteUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1980-08-04· cited 11×
- United States v. LewisUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1979-10-01· cited 10×
- United States v. PorterUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1981-12-14· cited 10×
- United States v. BrauchlerU S Air Force Court of Military Review· 1983-02-16· cited 10×
- United States v. BroadnaxUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1987-03-30· cited 10×
- United States v. ParkerU.S. Army Court of Military Review· 1979-10-25· cited 9×
- United States v. MadelaUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1981-12-14· cited 8×
- United States v. CarrUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1979-10-01· cited 7×
- United States v. CornellUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1980-07-14· cited 7×
- United States v. BlaneyAir Force Court of Criminal Appeals· 1999-01-11· cited 6×
- United States v. NormanUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1980-10-14· cited 4×
- United States v. LoweryU S Air Force Court of Military Review· 1982-07-08· cited 4×
- United States v. ColemanU.S. Army Court of Military Review· 1990-11-15· cited 4×
Cites
80 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court· 1974-02-27· cited 5,953×
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1973-02-21· cited 5,756×
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 4,761×
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court· 1975-06-09· cited 3,396×
- California v. GreenSupreme Court· 1970-06-23· cited 3,363×
- Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1977-06-17· cited 2,751×
- Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 1,939×
- Barber v. PageSupreme Court· 1968-04-29· cited 1,846×
- Greene v. McElroySupreme Court· 1959-06-29· cited 1,385×
- Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-02-24· cited 1,352×
- Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court· 1943-03-01· cited 1,191×
- Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1912-02-19· cited 1,035×
- Thompson v. City of LouisvilleSupreme Court· 1960-03-21· cited 801×
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1895-12-16· cited 594×
- United States v. Paul v. OatesSecond Circuit· 1977-06-03· cited 472×
- Morrison v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1934-01-08· cited 381×
- Kirby v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1899-04-11· cited 343×
- Relford v. Commandant, US Disciplinary Barracks, Fort LeavenworthSupreme Court· 1971-02-24· cited 308×
- United States v. Larry Starks, in No. 74-1966 Appeal of Alonzo Robinson, in No. 74-1947. Appeal of Donald Everett Abney, in No. 74-1967Third Circuit· 1975-04-21· cited 220×
Other cases named United States v. Strangstalien
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.