Third Circuit· 4/25/1952
United States v. Stoehr
Citations
- 196 F.2d 276
- 33 A.L.R. 2d 836
- 41 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1190
- 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 4155
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Where new evidence is opened up on redirect examination, the opposing party must be given the right of cross-examination on the new matter, but the privilege of recross-examination lies within the trial court’s discretion.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kalodner, Staley, Stewart
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
89 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. Leona M. Helmsley, Joseph v. Licari and Frank J. Turco, Leona M. HelmsleySecond Circuit· 1991-07-30· cited 170×
- United States v. KennyThird Circuit· 1972-05-22· cited 145×
- Walczak v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1985-03-06· cited 122×
- United States v. George LawsonSeventh Circuit· 1974-12-19· cited 115×
- Edward Byron Hale v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1971-02-02· cited 77×
- United States v. William BeaversSeventh Circuit· 2014-06-30· cited 72×
- United States v. Douglas G. Radtke, United States of America v. Scott Christopher Radtke, United States of America, Michael Thomas DonohoeEighth Circuit· 2005-07-18· cited 70×
- United States v. Howard M. GeringNinth Circuit· 1983-09-19· cited 68×
- Singletary v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-02-24· cited 67×
- United States v. Herman L. TaylorFourth Circuit· 1962-06-15· cited 66×
- United States v. Francis D. White and Gertrude W. WhiteSecond Circuit· 1969-10-10· cited 60×
- United States v. Friedland, David, in No. 80-2052 United States of America v. Friedland, Jacob, in No. 80-2053Third Circuit· 1981-11-10· cited 56×
- United States v. Richard v. CaielloSecond Circuit· 1970-04-20· cited 54×
- State v. Mustafa Abdulla Abu-IsbaSupreme Court of Kansas· 1984-07-13· cited 54×
- Pedro Luis Rodriguez Y Paz v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1972-06-29· cited 52×
- United States v. Edward M. OstendorffFourth Circuit· 1967-03-27· cited 51×
- United States v. Delbert NullFourth Circuit· 1969-09-23· cited 48×
- United States v. BarnetteEleventh Circuit· 1986-10-08· cited 48×
- Holland v. United States. Holland v. United StatesTenth Circuit· 1954-02-05· cited 47×
- United States v. Charles Hoffman, Jr.Seventh Circuit· 1969-12-08· cited 44×
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1942-02-09· cited 10,035×
- Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-02-24· cited 1,352×
- Shapiro v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1948-10-11· cited 599×
- District of Columbia v. ClawansSupreme Court· 1937-04-05· cited 381×
- Karrell v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1950-04-24· cited 95×
- United States v. MatotSecond Circuit· 1944-12-18· cited 69×
- United States v. FolletteE.D. Pennsylvania· 1940-05-15· cited 43×
- United States v. CarruthersSeventh Circuit· 1945-12-27· cited 31×
- Moyer v. ætna Life Ins. Co.Third Circuit· 1942-02-13· cited 31×
- United States v. 3.544 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situate in Philadelphia County, Pa.Third Circuit· 1945-02-08· cited 30×
- United States v. SullivanSecond Circuit· 1938-07-12· cited 30×
- United States v. WicoffSeventh Circuit· 1951-04-11· cited 21×
- Powell v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1938-10-28· cited 18×
- Heindel v. United StatesSixth Circuit· 1945-07-16· cited 17×
- United States v. BergThird Circuit· 1944-08-11· cited 16×
- Barshop v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1951-11-23· cited 15×
- United States v. ShapiroSecond Circuit· 1947-02-07· cited 14×
- United States v. German-American Vocational League, Inc.Third Circuit· 1946-01-31· cited 8×
- Hyde v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1947-12-22· cited 8×
- Faulk v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1933-11-04· cited 5×
Other cases named United States v. Stoehr
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.