United States v. Steven Eugene Jelinek

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court did not clearly err when it declined to give proffered unanimity instruction and special interrogatory
• explaining that the proper procedure entails a review of the lesser included conspiracy conviction and the continuing criminal enterprise conviction and a remand to vacate the conviction that subjects the defendant to double jeopardy
• affirming the district court’s refusal to give the defendant’s proffered unanimity instruction and special interrogatory
• approving the procedure under which the merits of both convictions are reviewed on direct appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).