United States v. Antonino Aiello

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding such a proposition holds even if the total sentences exceed a normal life expectancy
• noting that three violations are needed for a continuing series of violations
• upholding sentence of life imprisonment without parole imposed on “a large supplier of hard drugs to wholesale distributors for an extended period of time”
• affirming the defendant’s consecutive sentences, which totaled 140 years, based on the dictum in O’Neil
• affirming as admissible a detective's non-expert testimony regarding the meaning of recorded statements
• \The district court did not abuse its substantial discretion in choosing an appropriate sentence.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).