United States v. Stark

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• when the court is aware of a conflict between counsel and the defendant as to whether the defendant will testify
• calling it a “sensitive aspect of trial strategy”
• calling it a “sensitive aspect of trial strategy”
• calling it a “sensitive aspect of trial strategy”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• United States v. Roberto Flores, Jr.
  Seventh Circuit· 2014-01-03· cited 110×
• Phillip Hartsfield v. Stephanie Dorethy
  Seventh Circuit· 2020-02-03· cited 90×
• United States v. Marvin Cates
  Seventh Circuit· 2020-02-18· cited 56×
• United States v. Jackson
  Seventh Circuit· 2008-08-29· cited 51×
• United States v. Michael Brian Anderson
  Eleventh Circuit· 2021-06-15· cited 35×
• United States v. Bruce Jones
  Seventh Circuit· 2016-12-21· cited 24×
• United States v. Alayeto
  Seventh Circuit· 2010-12-17· cited 14×
• United States v. Wanigasinghe
  Seventh Circuit· 2008-11-03· cited 13×
• v. Vialpando
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2020-03-19· cited 12×
• United States v. Hood
  Tenth Circuit· 2010-08-17· cited 9×
• United States v. Harper
  Seventh Circuit· 2011-12-06· cited 8×
• United States v. Santiago Rodriguez-Aparicio
  Fifth Circuit· 2018-04-23· cited 8×
• United States v. Li Xin Wu
  Seventh Circuit· 2011-12-28· cited 7×
• United States ex rel. Logan v. Chandler
  N.D. Illinois· 2013-11-21· cited 4×
• Ex Parte Barnett
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2009-04-10· cited 1×
• United States v. Jackson, Eddie
  Seventh Circuit· 2008-08-29
• United States v. Udara Wanigasinghe
  Seventh Circuit· 2008-11-03
• United States v. Santiago Rodriguez-Aparicio
  Fifth Circuit· 2018-05-11
• United States v. Jenkins
  Seventh Circuit· 2008-08-14
• Thomas v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2023-02-17