· 12/28/2011
United States v. Li Xin Wu
Citations
- 668 F.3d 882
- 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 25871
- 2011 WL 6835000
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reaffirming that a violation of Rule 24(c) is renewed for plain error
- noting it would be a Rule 24(c) violation if “alternate jurors were in fact present with the jury when deliberations began”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Easterbrook, Posner, Wood
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.