Skip to main content
· 12/28/2011

United States v. Li Xin Wu

Citations

  • 668 F.3d 882
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 25871
  • 2011 WL 6835000

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reaffirming that a violation of Rule 24(c) is renewed for plain error
  • noting it would be a Rule 24(c) violation if “alternate jurors were in fact present with the jury when deliberations began”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Posner, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.