United States v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• 'Rule 10(e) exists to allow the district court to conform the record to what happened, not to what did not.'

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Marvin P. Johnson, Robert A. Wilkins, Duane Quamina, Patricia Gordon, Mark Francis Johnson
  Eleventh Circuit· 1983-08-29· cited 107×
• James W. Hoover v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, an Alabama Corporation, Usx Corporation, a Delaware Corp.
  Eleventh Circuit· 1988-09-30· cited 56×
• United States v. Clayton R. Page, III
  Fifth Circuit· 1981-11-20· cited 52×
• United States v. Charles D. McCorkle Jr.
  Seventh Circuit· 1975-04-01· cited 45×
• United States v. Duane Ehmer
  Ninth Circuit· 2023-12-07· cited 9×
• Harris v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1989-06-16· cited 5×
• Lester v. Portfolio Recovery Assocs., LLC
  N.D. Alabama· 2018-08-24· cited 2×
• Unnamed case
  Fifth Circuit· 1974-07-23

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Sullivan
  Supreme Court· 1927-05-16· cited 592×
• California v. Byers
  Supreme Court· 1971-05-17· cited 422×
• United States v. Bishop
  Supreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 417×
• United States v. William C. Douglass
  Fifth Circuit· 1973-04-06· cited 23×
• Sam E. Haner v. United States
  Fifth Circuit· 1963-04-04· cited 22×