James W. Hoover v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, an Alabama Corporation, Usx Corporation, a Delaware Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding “the district court acted properly in treating [the plaintiff’s] supplemental pleading as a nullity, particularly since it was inclined to deny any motion for leave to amend that [the plaintiff] might have filed”
• “[T]he district court acted properly in treating [plaintiff’s] supplemental pleading as a nullity, particularly since it was inclined to deny any motion for leave to amend that [plaintiff] might have filed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).