Fifth Circuit· 2/3/2010

United States v. Smith

Citations

595 F.3d 1322
2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 2335
2010 WL 366745

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that “[t]here is simply no basis” to make mandatory a sentencing reduction under § 3582(c)(2)
holding that “[t]here is simply no basis” to make mandatory a sentencing reduction under § 3582(c)(2)
rejecting the suggestion that a district court must grant a § 3582(c)(2) motion based on an amendment to the Guidelines because failing to do so creates unwarranted sentencing disparities
rejecting the suggestion that a district court must grant a § 3582(c)(2) motion based on an amendment to the Guidelines because failing to do so creates unwarranted sentencing disparities
rejecting the suggestion that a district court must grant a § 3582(c)(2) motion based on an amendment to the Guidelines because failing to do so creates unwarranted sentencing disparities
rejecting the suggestion that a district court must grant a § 3582(c)(2) motion based on an amendment to the Guidelines because failing to do so creates unwarranted sentencing disparities

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garza, Demoss, Clement

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.