United States v. Salvador Magluta

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating the proper application of § 5G1.2(d) requires that sentences run consecutively to the extent necessary to reach the punishment range set by the Guidelines, even though they are advisory
• “[A]n appellant may not raise an issue for the first time in a reply brief.”
• “[A]n appellant may not raise an issue for the first time in a reply brief.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).