Supreme Court· 5/2/1932
United States v. Smith
Citations
- 286 U.S. 6
- 52 S. Ct. 475
- 76 L. Ed. 954
- 1932 U.S. LEXIS 594
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- giving the House’s interpretation of its own rules controlling effect even though the interpretation was adopted after the plaintiff sued about the rule
- \[T]he Court must give great weight to [Congress's] ... construction of its own rules ....\
- “As the construction to be given the rules affects persons other than members of the Senate, the question presented is of necessity a judicial one.”
- “As the construction to be given the rules affects persons other than members of the Senate, the question presented is of necessity a judicial one.”
- “As the construction to be given to the rules affects persons other than members of the Senate, the question presented is of necessity a judicial one.”
- “ [W]e have, therefore, no occasion to consider the constitutional objection.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brandeis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. Borden Co.Supreme Court· 1939-12-04· cited 757×
- Wheeldin v. WheelerSupreme Court· 1963-06-03· cited 473×
- Guy Vander Jagt v. Thomas P. O'neill, Jr.D.C. Circuit· 1983-02-04· cited 186×
- Yellin v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-06-17· cited 153×
- Silva v. Hernández AgostoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1986-12-15· cited 134×
- John M. Bates v. Harold E. SponbergSixth Circuit· 1976-12-20· cited 103×
- Alan McSurely and Margaret McSurely v. John J. McClellanD.C. Circuit· 1976-12-21· cited 85×
- Gilbert v. GladdenSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1981-07-29· cited 75×
- Consumers Union of United States, Inc. v. Periodical Correspondents' Association, an Unincorporated AssociationD.C. Circuit· 1975-07-21· cited 51×
- Board of Trustees v. Attorney General of the CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2003-10-23· cited 50×
- Banco Popular de Puerto Rico v. Corte de Distrito de San JuanSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1944-02-09· cited 50×
- Abood v. League of Women Voters of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court· 1987-09-29· cited 45×
- Noriega Rodríguez v. JaraboSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1994-06-24· cited 41×
- Malone v. MeekinsAlaska Supreme Court· 1982-09-03· cited 36×
- Daniel Barker v. Patrick ConroyD.C. Circuit· 2019-04-19· cited 32×
- Acevedo Vilá v. Meléndez OrtizSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 2005-06-07· cited 30×
- Des Moines Register & Tribune Co. v. DwyerSupreme Court of Iowa· 1996-01-17· cited 25×
- Dagmar Wilson v. United States of America, Donna Allen v. United States of America, Russell Nixon v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1966-08-02· cited 20×
- State Ex Rel. Johnson v. HagemeisterNebraska Supreme Court· 1955-12-16· cited 20×
- State ex rel. Richardson v. Board of RegentsNevada Supreme Court· 1953-10-01· cited 20×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Crawford v. GilchristSupreme Court of Florida· 1912-06-15· cited 94×
- United States v. Le BaronSupreme Court· 1856-12-16· cited 42×
- Attorney General ex rel. Dust v. OakmanMichigan Supreme Court· 1901-05-21· cited 24×
- People ex rel. MacMahon v. DavisIllinois Supreme Court· 1918-06-20· cited 22×
- Wood v. CutterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1884-11-17· cited 20×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.