John M. Bates v. Harold E. Sponberg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Accardi reversed an agency’s action because the agency violated its own regulations not because the agency’s action violated due process
• no violation of due process when decision-making body voted on appeal from an administrative adjudication without reading the transcript, relying on summary report
• np violation of due process when decision-making body voted on appeal from an administrative adjudication without reading the transcript, relying on summary report
• “Agency actions in Accardi . . . were reversed for violations of their own regulations, but the court did not rely on the Due Process Clause.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).