United States v. Sergio Rodriguez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the fact that a defendant intentionally and repeatedly pointed a laser at an aircraft does not mean that he or she knew the risks of his or her conduct
• concluding that the risks posed by lasers are not matters of common knowledge
• concluding that the government failed to show recklessness sufficient to support applying the reckless endangerment enhancement, where the government presented no \evidence of what even an average person would know about the effects of aiming a laser at an aircraft\
• concluding that the United States failed to show recklessness sufficient to support applying the reckless endangerment enhancement, where the United States presented no \evidence of what even an average person would know about the effects of aiming a laser at an aircraft\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).