United States v. Segien

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• allowing prior bad acts evidence to show intent and lack of mistake
• affirming two § 111 convictions against one victim when the defendant’s acts—(1) grabbing the victim’s testicles and (2) orally threatening and spitting on the victim—were separated in time and location
• differing between an element of the offense and a sentencing enhancement
• evidence of “different events, separated in both time and location”
• discussing multiple 18 U.S.C. § 111 charges

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).