United States v. Arthur W. Rumney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding the denial of a Franks hearing after determining that there still remained adequate probable cause even if all of the appellant’s challenges were accepted
• rejecting Franks challenge based on omission of informant’s crimes because they were not “ones involving perjury or false statements”
• examining ______ these factors in holding that provision of the Armed Career Criminal Act of 1984 was a sentence enhancer, and not a separate offense
• informant’s “credibility was not undercut merely because 15 [informant] made predictable denials until the police could produce evidence linking him to the robbery.”
• \[The cooperating witness's] credibility was not undercut merely because he made predictable denials until the police could produce evidence linking him to the [crime].\
• employing insert- and-reassess approach to test materiality of omitted statements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).