United States v. Scott Torrellas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In assessing the likely effect of a Rule 11 error, we are to examine the entire record.”
• “[A] district court need not elicit detailed narrative responses from a defendant to satisfy itself that the plea has a factual basis[.]”
• “[W]here a defendant raises on appeal a claim of Rule 11 error that he did not raise in the district court, that claim is reviewable only for plain error.”
• “In 16 determining whether the defendant has” shown prejudice, “we consider . . . any record evidence . . . as well as the overall strength of the Government’s case.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).