Skip to main content
· 8/1/2005

United States v. Donald Gardner

Citations

  • 417 F.3d 541
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 15719
  • 2005 WL 1846803

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding alleged ineffectiveness of counsel was not apparent because the record “contain[ed] no evidence regarding what advice, if any, . . . counsel provided”
  • finding Rule 11 plea colloquy to be valid, although not extensive, when court directed yes-or-no questions to defendant and defendant provided a simple answer of “Yes, your Honor”
  • “The record contains no evidence regarding what advice, if any, [defendant’s] counsel provided with regard to the potential drug-quantity enhancement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nelson, Gilman, Donald

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.