Skip to main content
· 9/20/1995

United States v. Schiefen

Citations

  • 926 F. Supp. 877
  • 79 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1926
  • 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15393
  • 1995 WL 861625

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting argument that there was insufficient consideration to secure promissory note because lender had “created money” by means of bookkeeping entry, and noting argument that “United States currency is unbacked paper has been rejected by numerous courts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Piersol

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.