E.D. Virginia· 5/13/1983
United States v. Sample
Citations
- 565 F. Supp. 1166
- 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16980
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- statute of limitations is a legislatively determined safeguard against potential prejudice while due process is safeguard against actual prejudice
- statute *Page 878 of limitations is a legislatively determined safeguard against potential prejudice while due process is safeguard against actual prejudice
- statute of limitations is a legislatively determined safeguard against potential prejudice while due process is safeguard against actual prejudice
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Warriner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- J.B. Stoner v. Charles Graddick, Attorney General of Alabama and Freddie Smith, Commissioner of the Alabama Department of CorrectionsEleventh Circuit· 1985-01-16· cited 68×
- Whittlesey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-05-13· cited 24×
- United States v. SabathN.D. Illinois· 1998-01-12· cited 12×
- Rivera v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 2016-05-04· cited 12×
- State v. PrinceCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1991-06-28· cited 9×
- United States v. DavisS.D. New York· 1984-11-20· cited 7×
- State v. SealyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1999-02-26· cited 6×
- United States v. NaserkhakiE.D. Virginia· 1989-05-31· cited 4×
- State v. LeeMissouri Court of Appeals· 1993-06-29· cited 4×
- Howell v. BarkerE.D. North Carolina· 1988-03-29· cited 2×
- United States v. CreamerN.D. Illinois· 2005-04-08· cited 1×
- State v. McFarlandSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2025-09-02· cited 1×
- State v. McFarland (Second Concurrence)Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2025-09-02
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court· 1971-12-20· cited 3,756×
- United States v. LovascoSupreme Court· 1977-10-03· cited 2,170×
- United States v. Valenzuela-BernalSupreme Court· 1982-07-02· cited 1,404×
- United States v. EwellSupreme Court· 1966-02-23· cited 1,196×
- United States v. MacDonaldSupreme Court· 1982-03-31· cited 917×
- United States v. Jeffrey R. MacDonaldFourth Circuit· 1982-08-16· cited 146×
- United States v. Michael Ray TownleyFifth Circuit· 1982-01-11· cited 84×
- United States v. James W. ElsberySecond Circuit· 1979-06-25· cited 64×
- United States v. Robert Eugene Mills and Richard Raymond PierceNinth Circuit· 1981-07-07· cited 63×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,167 United States of America v. Benjamin Lieberman, United States of America v. Jack H. ShapiroFirst Circuit· 1980-01-07· cited 60×
- United States v. Stanley A. PartykaEighth Circuit· 1977-08-25· cited 43×
- United States v. Phillips Lee SaundersNinth Circuit· 1981-02-02· cited 42×
- United States v. Jose Raul Juarez, Jr.Seventh Circuit· 1977-08-15· cited 40×
- Miller v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court· 1978-06-12· cited 39×
- United States v. Wilfred King and Robert L. PriceSeventh Circuit· 1979-02-23· cited 32×
- United States v. Carl TaylorEighth Circuit· 1979-09-05· cited 27×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,004 United States of America v. Paul F. KendrickNinth Circuit· 1982-11-22· cited 20×
- United States v. Carl D. WehlingFifth Circuit· 1982-05-24· cited 19×
- United States v. WestFifth Circuit· 1978-02-21· cited 19×
- United States v. Ronald C. RogersEighth Circuit· 1981-01-30· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.