United States v. Samet

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that warrantless entry by officers justified when police, on prearranged signal by undercover officer inside apartment by consent, broke into apartment with battering ram
• holding that the circumstances of this case satisfied all the conditions of the “consent once removed” doctrine and that “[ajccordingly, the warrantless entry by the officers to assist in the arrest ... did not violate the Fourth Amendment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Henry
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1993-07-19· cited 34×
• State v. Johnston
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1993-06-23· cited 5×
• Smith v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-09-15

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Payton v. New York
  Supreme Court· 1980-04-15· cited 7,618×
• Lego v. Twomey
  Supreme Court· 1972-01-12· cited 1,930×
• Lewis v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1967-01-09· cited 885×
• United States v. David McCraw United States of America v. James Mathis
  Fourth Circuit· 1990-12-06· cited 115×
• United States v. Manuel Nicholas Diaz
  Seventh Circuit· 1987-04-28· cited 75×
• Foreman v. Internal Revenue Service
  Supreme Court· 1987-10-05· cited 73×
• United States v. Ronald Lee Paul
  Seventh Circuit· 1986-12-29· cited 45×
• Goldsmith v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1978-10-16· cited 42×
• United States v. Charles Dwain Templeman
  Eighth Circuit· 1991-07-08· cited 10×