United States v. Ronald Lee Paul

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the doctrine of consent once removed “extends to the case where the initial, consensual entry is by a confidential informant”
• noting that when one invites an undercover agent into his house, the agent can summon other agents to assist in the arrest
• noting that when one invites an undercover agent into his house, the agent can summon other agents to assist in the arrest
• noting that the officers entry into the suspects home was not “within the emergency exception to Payton
• noting that when one invites an undercover agent into his house, the agent can summon other agents to assist in the arrest
• noting that an owner's interest in the privacy of his home is fatally compromised when he \admits a confidential informant and proudly displays contraband to him\ and that \[i]t makes no difference that the owner does not know he is dealing with an informant\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).