Skip to main content
Tenth Circuit· 8/17/2004

United States v. Sack

Citations

  • 379 F.3d 1177
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 17100
  • 2004 WL 1834599

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Sack was in custody when released to a halfway house where the restrictions at the halfway house were similar to the restrictions at Burke’s RRC
  • holding that Sack was in custody when released to a halfway house where the restrictions at the halfway house were similar to the restrictions at Burke’s RRC
  • finding defendant was in custody for purposes of the escape statute when ordered to live at a halfway house while on pretrial release
  • “[B]eeause the plain language of the statute allows for a charge of escape based on ‘any custody’ resulting from a court order there is no reason to conclude that a defendant must be in the custody of the Attorney General.”
  • “[W]e are not persuaded by the reasoning in Baxley.”
  • failure to return to halfway house

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Seymour, Holloway, Murphy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named United States v. Sack

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.