United States v. Lizardi-Maldonado

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that damages for breach of an express warranty is “the remedy for a buyer who has accepted defective goods”
• explaining that the Court \strongly discourage[s] the use of an attorney-fee application as an invitation to become mired in a second round of litigation\
• applying UCC principles to a consumer fraud case and concluding that the cost of replacing a damaged carpet was the appropriate measure of damages, as that method put the buyer in the position he would have been in if he had received a non-defective carpet
• “Merchants draw consumers into their stores by holding sales events . . . that promise the regular value of a product at a reduced price.”
• “The [CFA] is remedial legislation that we construe liberally to accomplish its broad purpose of safeguarding the public.”
• \[A] plenary hearing should be conducted only when the certifications of counsel raise material factual disputes that can be resolved solely by the taking of testimony.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).