Fifth Circuit· 10/19/1993
United States v. Roch
Citations
- 5 F.3d 894
- 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 27282
- 1993 WL 413854
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- indicating that the suspect vehicle was “only described by its . . . color” without the “make, model, year of manufacture, or license number”
- observing that police failed to “corroborate the driver’s identity, his felon status, or his future activity”
- indicating that the suspect vehicle was “only described by its . . . color” without the “make, model, year of manufacture, or license number”
- observing that police failed to “corroborate the driver’s identity, his felon status, or his future activity”
- “hold[ing] that, like a partnership, an LLC is a citizen of every state 6 of which its owners/members are citizens”
- “While in general . . . the defendant has the burden of proving . . . that the material in question was seized in violation of his constitutional rights, there are several situations where the burden shifts to the government.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jones, Demoss, Kazen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
53 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. Aguero-MirandaFifth Circuit· 1999-12-29· cited 159×
- United States v. Edgar Castro, United States of America v. Susana GomezFifth Circuit· 1999-01-28· cited 114×
- United States v. Ezekiel GardnerFourth Circuit· 2016-05-18· cited 114×
- State v. WorwoodUtah Supreme Court· 2007-06-22· cited 92×
- United States v. RivasFifth Circuit· 1998-10-02· cited 92×
- United States v. GomezFifth Circuit· 2010-10-07· cited 89×
- United States v. Reginald Keith CarheeTenth Circuit· 1994-06-22· cited 86×
- United States v. CooperFifth Circuit· 1995-01-13· cited 77×
- Lebedun v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1998-07-07· cited 76×
- United States v. Fausto LopezSeventh Circuit· 2018-10-18· cited 71×
- United States v. Roberto ZamoraFifth Circuit· 2011-10-19· cited 68×
- United States v. Nunez-SanchezFifth Circuit· 2007-02-07· cited 62×
- United States v. MartinezFifth Circuit· 2007-05-15· cited 60×
- State of Iowa v. Craig E. HarrisonSupreme Court of Iowa· 2014-05-02· cited 56×
- United States v. HoFifth Circuit· 1996-08-29· cited 53×
- United States v. Ernesto Guerrero-BarajasFifth Circuit· 2001-01-26· cited 52×
- United States v. BlountFifth Circuit· 1996-10-24· cited 49×
- Eleanor Keller v. Attala CountyFifth Circuit· 2020-02-20· cited 48×
- Shawn Northrup v. City of Toledo Police Dep'tSixth Circuit· 2015-05-13· cited 42×
- United States v. MaskFifth Circuit· 2003-05-01· cited 39×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 16,716×
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1972-06-12· cited 5,118×
- United States v. SokolowSupreme Court· 1989-04-03· cited 4,647×
- Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court· 1990-06-11· cited 3,282×
- United States v. Bonifacio De La Fuente, Ronald Albert Cardenas, George Sierra, Pat Vargas,augie D. Sierra, and Robert StewartFifth Circuit· 1977-03-10· cited 179×
- United States v. Izeal Rideau, Jr.Fifth Circuit· 1992-08-14· cited 157×
- United States v. Sean O. WatsonFifth Circuit· 1992-01-31· cited 81×
- United States v. Danny Reuben CastenedaFifth Circuit· 1992-02-03· cited 71×
- United States v. Hunter Keith JacksonFifth Circuit· 1987-05-20· cited 67×
- United States v. Jose Samuel DiazFifth Circuit· 1992-10-30· cited 45×
- United States v. Noe Lopez-GonzalezFifth Circuit· 1990-10-30· cited 35×
- United States v. Larry Dale WanglerFifth Circuit· 1993-03-18· cited 22×
Other cases named United States v. Roch
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.