United States v. Robert Lyle Pierce

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the statute of limitations does not restrict what a district court could consider as relevant conduct under the Sentencing Guidelines
• affirming a § 2T1.1(b)(2) enhancement where defendant's conduct, including providing false information to his employer, went beyond lying on a 1040 form
• “Where there is no affirmative misconduct by either party, the court’s conclusion that this second factor authorizes dismissal with or without prejudice is a matter within its discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).