Skip to main content
· 3/19/2001

United States v. Robert Lee Mitchell

Citations

  • 243 F.3d 953
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 4064
  • 2001 WL 261719

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • no showing of “actual prejudice” required for violation of former Rule 32(c)(3)(A), precursor to Rule 32(i)(1)(A)
  • no showing of “actual prejudice” required for violation of former Rule 32(c)(3)(A), precursor to Rule 32(i)(1)(A)
  • addressing former Rule 32(c)(3)(A), the precursor to Rule 32(i)(1)(A)
  • addressing former Rule 32(c)(3)(A), the precursor to Rule 32(i)(1)(A)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Martin, Moore, Tarnow

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.