Skip to main content
· 5/30/2002

United States v. James Pete Osborne, James Carl Osborne

Citations

  • 291 F.3d 908
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 10179
  • 2002 WL 1077576

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that \literal compliance\ is required

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Krupansky, Boggs, Lawson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.