Skip to main content
· 7/29/2015

United States v. Robert Lee

Citations

  • 795 F.3d 682
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 13178
  • 2015 WL 4547005

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “the full panoply of rights that the Constitution guarantees to criminal defendants does not extend” to revocation proceedings
  • applying plain error review to forfeited claims arising from a revoca- tion hearing
  • applying plain error review to forfeited claims arising from a revoca- tion hearing
  • applying plain error review to forfeited claims arising from a revocation hearing
  • \[T]he full panoply of rights that the Constitution guarantees to criminal defendants does not extend to them\ in revocation hearings
  • ex‐ plaining that “the full panoply of rights that the Constitution guarantees to criminal defendants does not extend” to revoca‐ tion proceedings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wood, Flaum, Kennelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.