United States v. Lamond D. Kelley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding record was sufficiently clear for appellate court to conclude hearsay was sufficiently trustworthy
• finding that the statements at issue were corroborated by the independent testimony of the responding law enforcement officer
• holdings of Scarpelli and Morrissey apply to revocation of supervised release
• affirming revocation of supervised release based on hearsay; defendant raised constitutional challenge but did not rely on Rule 32.1
• affirming revocation of supervised release based on hearsay evidence for which government had strong corroborating evidence
• finding police report admissible hearsay where it was corroborated by physical evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).