Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 9/30/1983

United States v. Robert E. Tucker

Citations

  • 716 F.2d 576

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, in complex fraud case, “it should have been obvious to a competent lawyer that the assistance of an accountant [was] necessary.”
  • holding that “the totality of counsel’s errors and omissions” may support a finding of unfairness and prejudice
  • holding that the failure to interview or to attempt to interview key prosecution witnesses constitutes deficient performance
  • stating when pretrial investigation and preparation is inadequate, the record is necessarily incomplete as to extent of prejudice
  • stating that some “defense away from that location in a strategies may be so ill-chosen that they deserted area, opened the m a y r e n d e r c o u n s e l ’ s o v e r al l trunk and [the victim] was representation constitutionally deficient”
  • prosecutor emphasized in his closing argument that no witnesses corroborated defendant’s version of events

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ely, Sneed, Alarcon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

82 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

66 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.