Ninth Circuit· 11/2/2005

Daniels v. Woodford

Citations

428 F.3d 1181

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that the relevant inquiry is whether “there was such a degree of prejudice against the petitioner that a fair trial was impossible”
noting that the relevant inquiry is whether \there was such a degree of prejudice against the petitioner that a fair trial was impossible\
recognizing an irreconcilable conflict where there was a complete lack of communication between attorney and client
holding that the fact that \[t]he jury deliberated for two days before returning a verdict ... suggests that the jury may have been influenced by [additional] evidence had it been offered\ and concluding that \[t]his alone is sufficient for a finding of prejudice\
indicating that testimony suggest- ing that a capital defendant is a “sociopath” is aggravating rather than mitigating
recognizing an irreconcilable conflict where there was a complete lack of communication between attorney and client

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fletcher, Pregerson, Ferguson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

77 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

70 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.