Ninth Circuit· 11/10/1992

United States v. Robert Deleon

Citations

979 F.2d 761
92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9144
92 Daily Journal DAR 15151
1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 29292
1992 WL 322290

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

applying Franlcs where the affiant was present during the non-affiant investigator’s telephone interviews.and based same-day affidavit on those interviews
warrant cannot be based on untrained or inexperienced person's claim to have smelled growing plants that have no commonly recognized odor
“[A] warrant cannot be based on the claim of an untrained or inexperienced person to have smelled growing plants which have no commonly recognized odor.”
warrant cannot be based on untrained or inexperienced person's claim to have smelled growing plants that have no commonly recognized odor
“Where . . . a warrant’s 15 validity is challenged for deliberate or reckless omissions of facts that tend to mislead, the 16 affidavit must be considered with the omitted information included.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hug, Nelson, Walker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

56 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.