United States v. Stanley Mills Stanert

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that deliberate or reckless omissions of facts that tend to mislead are false statements for Franks purposes
• requiring “a substantial showing that the affiant intentionally or recklessly omitted facts required to prevent technically true statements in the affidavit from being misleading”
• telling magistrate that suspect had been arrested for prior offense without mentioning he was never convicted indicated recklessness.
• advising judge about previous drug lab explosion, but failing to disclose that it occurred before the defendant owned or resided on the premises indicated at least a reckless disregard for the truth.
• court looks only to the information contained within the four corners of an affidavit when reviewing the validity of a search warrant
• court looks only to the information contained within the four corners of an affidavit when reviewing the validity of a search warrant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).