United States v. Rizk

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[U]ncharged acts may be admissible as direct evidence of the 6 conspiracy itself.” (quoting United States v. Thai, 29 F.3d 785, 812 (2d Cir. 1994))
• “[a] district court may not order restitution such that victims will receive an amount greater than their actual losses”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).