Skip to main content
Sixth Circuit· 1/17/2008

United States v. Ridner

Citations

  • 512 F.3d 846
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 977
  • 2008 WL 150038

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a justification defense is proper only if “a reasonable jury could conclude by a preponderance of the evidence that each of the” factors is met (emphasis added).
  • \emphasiz[ing] that the keystone of the analysis is that the defendant must have no alternative-either before or during the event-to avoid violating the law\ [internal quotation marks omitted]
  • discussing the different questions asked at different stages of the litigation
  • one supporting element of the necessity defense is whether sufficient evidence was presented showing that the defendant did not place himself in a situation requiring him to choose to commit a criminal act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Merritt, Clay, Cox

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named United States v. Ridner

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.